Canon · camera stats

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

How 1,823 real photos from this camera were shot — and how they were edited in Lightroom.

Aggregated from photos analyzed on PixelPeeper · no spec sheets, only observed behavior

#21
most analyzed of 99 cameras
f/3.2
median aperture
ISO 250
median · p95 2,500
1/319s
median shutter
84%
shot in Manual mode

Shooting DNA

How Canon EOS R5 Mark II photos are shot

1,823 all-time photos · 1,039 with Lightroom edits

Aperture

  1. f/1.4 or wider 5%
  2. f/1.8 18%
  3. f/2.8 27%
  4. f/4 25%
  5. f/5.6 14%
  6. f/8+ 12%

ISO

  1. <=200 48%
  2. 400 18%
  3. 800 16%
  4. 1600 10%
  5. 3200 5%
  6. 6400+ 3%

Real-world ISO ceiling: 95% of photos stay at or below ISO 2,500.

Shutter speed

  1. 1/1000s+ 31%
  2. 1/500s 17%
  3. 1/250s 28%
  4. 1/125s 19%
  5. 1/60s 2%
  6. slower 4%

Focal length

Most common focal lengths recorded in EXIF.

  1. 28mm 16%
  2. 50mm 10%
  3. 35mm 9%
  4. 24mm 9%
  5. 70mm 8%
  6. 32mm 3%
  7. 31mm 3%
  8. 38mm 2%
  9. 30mm 2%
  10. 34mm 2%

Exposure mode

  1. Manual 84%
  2. Aperture-priority AE 14%
  3. Shutter speed priority AE 2%

Time of day

When photos are captured, from EXIF timestamps.

Peak hour
17:00 · 12%
Flash fired
13%

Capture year

When the analyzed photos were taken · 2024-2026

  1. 2024 12%
  2. 2025 69%
  3. 2026 19%

What's mounted on the Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Lens pairings from the last 90 days, compared with the all-time share.

Last 90 days · 687 photos

  1. 1 Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM 35% down
  2. 2 Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM 16% up
  3. 3 Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM 13% up
  4. 4 Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8L IS USM Z 8% up
  5. 5 RF28-70mm F2.8 IS STM 6% flat
  6. 6 Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM 4% flat
  7. 7 Canon RF 35mm f/1.4L VCM 4% up
  8. 8 Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM 2% down
  9. 9 Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM 2% flat
  10. 10 Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM 1% flat
  11. 11 RF100-300mm F2.8 L IS USM + EXTENDER RF1.4x 1% flat
  12. 12 Canon EF 24mm f/1.4L II USM 1% flat

Adapted EF lenses still account for 5% of the top recent pairings.

The edit fingerprint

How Canon EOS R5 Mark II photos are edited

Median Lightroom develop settings across every analyzed edit — data nobody else has.

from 405 Lightroom edits · last 90 days

The typical Canon EOS R5 Mark II edit

Dot = median · band = Middle 50% of edits. Neutral sliders are hidden.

  • Exposure +0.2
  • Contrast +5
  • Highlights -30
  • Shadows +32
  • Whites -15
  • Blacks +15
  • Saturation -5

Ranges show the middle 50% of edited photos.

The Canon EOS R5 Mark II tone curve

Median curve across all custom tone curves, with the middle 50% band.

Custom curve
100%
lift blacks
35%
lower whites
62%

Most-touched sliders

Share of edits where each Lightroom slider was moved away from neutral.

  1. Shadows 98%
  2. Highlights 97%
  3. Blacks 93%
  4. Exposure 91%
  5. Green saturation 90%
  6. Green hue 84%
  7. Blue luminance 83%
  8. Whites 83%
  9. Orange saturation 80%
  10. Green luminance 80%
  11. Red luminance 80%
  12. Orange hue 80%
  13. Contrast 79%
  14. Yellow hue 78%
  15. Yellow saturation 78%
  16. Red hue 77%

White balance & profiles

Custom
77%
As Shot
22%
Auto
1%
Median temperature
5,800K
Median tint
+7
  1. Adobe Standard 85%
  2. Camera Standard 9%
  3. DVLOP X 4%
  4. Camera Neutral 1%
  5. Camera Monochrome 1%

The Canon EOS R5 Mark II color profile

Rendered from aggregate color grading and HSL data — never from photos.

Color grading

Median hue and saturation per layer, shown as the color it produces.

No reliable color grading sample yet.

Black & white
13%
Grain
58%
Vignette
6%
Cropped
98%

Color mixer activity

How often each HSL channel gets adjusted, with the hue/sat/lum split.

  • Red hue 77% · sat 52% · lum 80%
  • Orange hue 80% · sat 80% · lum 75%
  • Yellow hue 78% · sat 78% · lum 67%
  • Green hue 84% · sat 90% · lum 80%
  • Aqua hue 58% · sat 64% · lum 50%
  • Blue hue 54% · sat 76% · lum 83%
  • Purple hue 26% · sat 66% · lum 28%
  • Magenta hue 29% · sat 67% · lum 10%

Shoot with a Canon EOS R5 Mark II?

Upload a photo to see its full EXIF and Lightroom settings — the same data these stats are built from.

Analyze your photo

Methodology

Stats are aggregated from photos analyzed on PixelPeeper, capped per contributor so no single uploader can dominate a page. Shooting values come from EXIF metadata; editing values come from Lightroom XMP develop settings when present. No photos are shown — every chart and swatch is derived from aggregate numbers. generated July 04, 2026.